February 1

Chinwag with Vinay Gaonkar


Vinay Gaonkar used to work at VMware, and since switched to Violin Memory – last year and this year VMware worked with Violin to smash through the psychological performance barrier of 1M IOPS to a VM. This year the guys at the performance team in VMware took a Violin Array and used it to do some Eric Sloof-Style “Myth Busting”, showing how there is no real performance difference between VMFS/VMDK and RDMs (Raw Device Mappings). It’s persistent myth that the “RAW” in RDM indicate some sort of “native throughput” that outperforms our VMFS/VMDK files. It’s something I’ve been saying since I was instructor in 2004/5. For me RDMs perhaps should have been called “Native Device Mappings”, because the allow the VM to natively speak to a LUN (iSCSI/FC) on the array mainly to get features or meet requirements for rather particular configurations – for example in the early days of MSCS Clustering inside a VM often you’d find either physical or virtual RDMs were a requirement to get to the shared/quorum volumes… or in technologies like EMC Recover Point you needed RDM to get some sort of “management LUN”. Both use case – really had nothing to do with performance….

ITunes (Audio Only) or RSS Feed
iTunes (Video Only) or RSS Feed

Copyright 2018. All rights reserved.

Posted February 1, 2013 by Michelle Laverick in category "Chinwag